Short Version:
Everyone has their own tolerances on bike tradeoffs. Some of
my friends are happy to have a bike that is a more competent gravity rig for
the tradeoff of some more XC/trail features; others would consider this
sacrilege.
For me, after a season on this bike, I was leaning slightly
more to the latter. I ended up changing steeds in late September after simple
economics conspired against a continued weight loss plan for the 5010/Solo (carbon
wheels and a carbon frame).
My final word: If you decide this is your rig, go light on this bike from the start, and
seriously evaluate its use. Santa Cruz bills it as the more XC/trail version of
the Bronson. I don’t have experience with the latter, but I think if I was riding more
technical trails, I’d just go with a Bronson, and if I wanted a trail bike, I’d look at
other options. This leaves a fairly small niche for the Solo to fill, but if it
fits, it really won’t disappoint.
Long version:
I spent the summer riding an aluminum, Santa Cruz 5010, AKA
Solo (I had a 2013 frame, so, technically, I had a Solo.)
The bike was assembled locally here at Chain Reaction
Cycles, and they treated me very well. I went with an XT/XTR 2X gruppo, Fox
F-32 CTD 120mm Kashima fork and Fox Kashima Float CTD shock, and a Rock Shox Reverb
remote dropper. The shop threw on an XTR 2x crank. It pays to shop local.
This bike wants you to ride hard and ride fast. The more you
push it, the better it feels. I hammered some descents I’ve ridden for years in
ways I never knew I could. The bike has a fairly long wheel base and a semi-slacked head tube, and that
gives it a “rides on rails” feel at speed.
I never pushed it through anything super technical since I
never took it outside AK, but I have no reason to think the bike would not
impress.
One of the things I liked the most out if this bike, it
actually made me a better rider on my hard tail. Normally, the transition back
and forth between full squish and hard tail is harsh, and takes a few miles and
a bad line or two to re-calibrate.
Not with the Solo.
Another big surprise came from the 650b wheel size. I really
wasn’t expecting much from the “new” wheel size. Sure, the hyped 29r wheels
roll over “anything,” but I expected little improvement on the “roll-ability”
from 650b. I was pleasantly surprised that this 5-inch bike rode like it was
packing 6 inches.
Did the bike still retain the nimble-ness of a smaller wheel
size? Hang on, I’ll get there.
Lastly, ya, Santa Cruz VPP suspension: it’s efficient.
That’s all over the Internets though.
A slimmed down Solo at Bench Lake. |
Biggest mistake, buy freaking carbon. It’s 2014, not 2004.
This is all on me. Robin – “I’ll sell you a carbon anything” – D at Chain
Reaction told me to go carbon. He pushed, and I resisted.
The fact of the matter is, some bike manufactures are
getting rid of aluminum frames all together. The shift is happening, and it’s
happening for a reason. As a friend deep in the industry said to me two years
ago when I asked him about the shift to carbon: “they wouldn’t be doing it if
it wasn’t working."
That being said, I could not get over my own fears.
That being said, I could not get over my own fears.
None of this has to do with the bike itself, but it did
however, heavily influence how I felt about it throughout the season.
This bike felt like a tank from ride 1. I immediately put it
on a diet. The stock Maxxis High Roller II tires were swapped for Maxxis Ardent
Races. The former were very heavy for tires that are considered trail tires. Unless
your trails go predominately downhill, they ride like suction cups.
Next went the dropper post. I can’t say I feel like my riding is
getting held back by my saddle height. While droppers are starting to expand
their appeal beyond just the gravity scene, it was an easy, top-heavy, pound of
weight to get rid of. I found a deal on an OE carbon post and slid it in.
Then came the drive train. Remember that XTR crank? Light,
yep; but geared high at 28/40T with an 11-36T cassette. Maybe if I kept my
rides under 2 hours on rolling terrain I could manage these ratios, but
stretched out on rides that last over 4 or more hours and climb thousands of
vertical feet, my legs were over-taxed on long climbs, and often lacked the
extra oompf needed for short steeps or technical maneuvers.
The logical option was to swap out the 24/38T XT crank on my
Scott Scale 910. Problem: the angle between the Solo’s rear wheel and bottom
bracket make it impossible to route the chain to a crank with anything less
than a 28T ring without grinding on the bottom of a Shimano XT 2x clamp on front
derailleur. The only solutions would have been to stick with the high-geared XTR
2x and go long cage with a pie-plate cassette in the back, or run an XT triple
up front (I guess I could have gone straight 1X too). I went with the latter, going in the opposite direction as far as
weight savings, but alternatively, giving the bike a wider range of gears.
While the trend is decidedly moving toward 1X at the front, for the long and
diverse rides this bike does, options are nice. On a plus note, I still moved
the XTR crank to my Scott Scale and it was a welcome upgrade.
Nimbleness Question: The bike’s long wheel base, somewhat
slacked head tube, and low bottom bracket height all helped to make this one
seriously BA bike on the descent, but conspired against it on technical climbs.
This bike felt nimble at speed, but I would not use that
term climbing. Crank and bottom bracket strikes were common. The bike threw big wheelies at speed, but they were obnoxious when pointed upward.
I found myself off the bike and pushing a couple very short sections of trail for the first time this season, and I was really displeased by that.
I found myself off the bike and pushing a couple very short sections of trail for the first time this season, and I was really displeased by that.
Every full suspension bike is billed these days as being a great climber. Bike builders aren’t necessarily lying, but they are oft speaking only to a bike’s linkage efficiency. Linkage efficiency is only part of the equation though. If you ride up fire roads, and drop gnarly trails, than all the things I just complained about won’t really matter.
I found myself dreading taking the Solo
back to the trails in the east. The technical, rooty, rocky, "WTF is a switchback" trails require deft
handling and a nimble bike capable of withstanding a lot of abuse going both up and down. On paper, the Solo should have owned those trails,
but in reality, I knew I’d be leaving behind orange paint marks on the slick
quartz and granite features, not to mention a bit of anger at not being able to
ride features I used to crush on an XC bike.
As for Alaska, we certainly don’t have much in the way of gravel road access,
nor technical trails.
I guess, where I get a little irked at Santa Cruz directly,
is when they call this bike the perfect backcountry steed.
What backcountry has a gravel road for the climb, and what
backcountry rig requires that you walk ridable features?
Another tragic experience was the severing of a pivot link axel
after about a month of riding. This is not unheard of for Santa Cruz VPP suspension;
the Internet will tell you some stories. Santa Cruz was quick to respond to the
shop when contacted, and immediately sent replacements, no questions asked. The
one disconcerting thing: in an email between myself and a Santa Cruz tech, he
described it as a “fluke” and said he had never seen that. When there are multi-page
threads dedicated to the subject on forums like MTBR, I guess I’d just leave it
at “sorry, replacements on the way, happy trails.” Like said, the issue was responded to promptly, and
it never occurred again this summer, so, no complaints, just an observation.